[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: libldap-2.2.so.7 - RHEL4 library problem
- To: Buchan Milne <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Subject: Re: libldap-2.2.so.7 - RHEL4 library problem
- From: Yuugy <email@example.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 12:11:40 -0800 (PST)
- Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=x8Dorg5dSEM4k6MlToVUhiPTs71QVpZH6jI8rccxfiiAN5n3xs1Wcp76BUbsdaXuVC0y7j8q/jl/9UOEXH9kzimxuElGJCMpsMC18fTPqTHlZrk6ZJE7nne/Txa6qjanbnV+7GUt/8A5QI1SxPHy7bNODilkFkTw3uPezPacJsA= ;
- In-reply-to: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Thanks but I would like very much to understand the
library conflict issue by building my own rpm for
If anyone has done anything like this or could step or
point me in the right direction it would be nice.
--- Buchan Milne <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Friday 24 March 2006 16:12, Yuugy wrote:
> > Buchan,
> > Thanks for the answers! I'm in the process of
> > building a RHEL spec file and trying to the
> > issue on my own but am confused as to how to
> > the OpenLDAP 2.3.20 libraries without conflicting
> > the current official RHEL library. How and what
> do I
> > look at to remedy this?
> IMHO, don't waste your time, use my packages ...
> We run those in production on our small (60 000
> entries) installation on RHEL3
> and RHEL4.
> There are other issues which my packages address
> which aren't addressed in the
> RH/Fedora packages.
> Buchan Milne
> ISP Systems Specialist
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around