[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Replication oddity in 2.3.19
On Thu, 2 Feb 2006, Kevin Spicer wrote:
> > I should point out that there are several suffixes handled by the one
> > server. And the first suffix (not this), with an identical
> > configuration except for rid= etc, replicates OK...
> Are these seperate suffixes or are they glued together with
> 'subordinate'. I've had some issues with syncrepl & glue (see ITS#4323)
Individual suffixes, which are also joined together with back-meta to form
a "view" of all suffixes; however, the point is that except for the first
physical suffix, any changes are not propagated until that entry is again
retrieved. Really weird...
Dave Horsfall DTM VK2KFU email@example.com Ph: +61 2 9552-5509 (d) -5500 (sw)
Corinthian Engineering P/L, 54/19-21 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont, NSW 2009, Australia