[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: sizelimit evaluated before ACLs?

To: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: Re: sizelimit evaluated before ACLs?
From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 00:10:31 +0100
Cc: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>, OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <1132871498.3343.33.camel@ando>
References: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0511231510100.15422@grapevine.cc.utexas.edu> <4384F7CF.5060102@symas.com> <6.2.1.2.0.20051123211734.02d20d90@mail.openldap.org> <1132871498.3343.33.camel@ando>

On Thu, 2005-11-24 at 23:31 +0100, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> This wouldn't even break pagedResponse in back-bdb/back-
> hdb, as far as I understand.

I mean: not more than it's already now :)

p.




Ing. Pierangelo Masarati
Responsabile Open Solution

SysNet s.n.c.
Via Dossi, 8 - 27100 Pavia - ITALIA
http://www.sys-net.it
------------------------------------------
Office:   +39.02.23998309          
Mobile:   +39.333.4963172
Email:    pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it
------------------------------------------

References:
- sizelimit evaluated before ACLs?
  - From: Eric Irrgang <erici@motown.cc.utexas.edu>
- Re: sizelimit evaluated before ACLs?
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
- Re: sizelimit evaluated before ACLs?
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
- Re: sizelimit evaluated before ACLs?
  - From: Pierangelo Masarati <ando@sys-net.it>

Prev by Date: Re: sizelimit evaluated before ACLs?
Next by Date: Re: How to find out whether overlay module is loaded to openldap
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread