[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: modrdn err=71 question

> back-hdb does, and at least in 2.3.11 or later, is as robust as back-bdb.
> I personally would avoid using back-ldbm if at all possible for numerous
> reasons. ;)  And hopefully it'll be removed when 2.4 comes out.

I would make a care for ldbm as it doesn't seem to create as much i/o
load as back-bdb.  This is helpful with a large database.