[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Slapd (OpenLDAP v2.3.11) Hangs Using 100% CPU Upon Start Up
- To: OpenLDAP software list <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
- Subject: Re: Slapd (OpenLDAP v2.3.11) Hangs Using 100% CPU Upon Start Up
- From: Rik Herrin <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:58:21 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=K7X1bNy0mkxoiUtkcPuD6GUARQevpuHJcXVMohttwim7KoAnX1RpQivGE5ddMEJ2RSfPI7MZ6DiSYHfYW42XkhsMt6bqZhFuV/xuqOMCXCXua3w+om06VqsohgIXiae+4IjxOSe2ZW/d9Ld8j0OR+6lxzcL6AxL4+qeDE5x5TZ8= ;
- In-reply-to: <3C45AC5AAFF09AE0D483F2D0@[10.0.0.1]>
Quanah Gibson-Mount <email@example.com> wrote:
--On Tuesday, November 15, 2005 11:16 AM -0800 Rik Herrin
> Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Tuesday, November 15, 2005 10:54 AM -0800 Rik Herrin
>>> OpenLDAP 2.3 *automatically* recovers the database. By running
>>> manually in addition to the slapd startup doing it, you are likely
>>> corrupting your database.
> Please keep replies to the list.
>> Actually, I ran db_recover after stopping slapd and after I noticed that
>> slapcat was trying to recover the database but entering an infinite loop
>> instead. Since I know the db directories, should I try to replace
>> slapd_db_revover2.3 with db_recover in ldap2.3 instead of is
>> slapd_db_recover2.3 of any use?
> The point here is, you should not be running db_recover at all. OpenLDAP
> 2.3.11 does this for you automatically anytime the database needs it. I
> suggest you don't use any instance of db_recover at all. It sounds like
> slapcat might have a bug in how it recovers the database after you ran
> db_recover manually.
> If I shouldn't be running it manually, does this mean that it's a bug in
> slapd (OpenLDAP v2.3)? It was slapd that went into an infinite loop and
> could not recover. Or it is a problem with my version of BDB? When I
> saw that slapcat2.3 seemed to hang when recovering the database (after
> I'd shut down slapd), I decided to use db_recover (I wasn't aware of
> slapd2.3_db_recover, which seems to be made for OpenLDAP v2.3.
That's sadly not something I can easily answer based on your configuration.
I wouldn't be using RedHat's version of BDB. ;)
Quanah, do you think it's better if I compiled BDB by hand since I can't seem to get a hold of Buchan's BDB package? If so, should I compile 4.2.52 or the later 4.3 (I know from a previous thread that you can't disable logging on 4.3 which is why under heavy loads 4.2.52 might be a better choice but I don't think I'll be running into such heavy loads). Should I stick to your compilation notes over at: http://www.stanford.edu/services/directory/openldap/configuration/bdb-build-42.html or are they out-dated?
> In any case, just stop using any form of db_recover. It isn't
> necessary in the majority of use cases. And you really shouldn't
> db_recover before running slapcat.
> I ran slapcat first and when it hung on opening the db, I closed it
> and ran db_recover. Just out of curiosity, what would you have done
> given this situation? Would running slap2.3_db_recover been a better
> choice as slapd did not automatically recover? Thanks for your time...
Likely the slapd2.3_db_recover would have been better. It is fairly hard
to say at this point, as you really got into a very odd situation.
Do you think that slapd_db_recover 2.3i s made to work better with 4.3 dbs or to work irrespecfive of the BDB backend. From what happened in my case, I was thinking of switching the 2 in the initialization script so that db_recover is called before slapd_db_recover so that my LDAP server doesn't hang in the case of database recovery.
Thanks for your time.
Principal Software Developer
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html
Yahoo! FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.