[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Corrupt LDAP DB ...
On Fri, 2005-10-28 at 09:29 -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> --On Friday, October 28, 2005 8:38 AM +0200 "C.Lee Taylor"
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >> Whether you pay RedHat or not, you still get bad OpenLDAP packages.
> > What makes it's bad? Compiler? Patches? Init scripts? Version? I would
> > really like to see my choice of distro, with a good implementation of
> > LDAP ... So I would like to try and find the problem here.
> RedHat typically sticks with very old OpenLDAP releases for a very long
> time. For example, they stuck with OpenLDAP 2.0.x for many many years,
> long after it was deprecated, causing major headaches for people using
> >> Other distros have better packages for free (or for pay).
> > Which ones, I would like to try and figure this out, and maybe help fix
> > it in the long run.
> Mandriva comes to mind.
of course openldap does not a distro make. There may be other
considerations too. Red Hat has continually generally not offered the
latest/greatest versions of things in their Enterprise stuff just to
have confidence of seasoning and the comfort level of the devil you
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.