[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: BDB vs. HDB

To: Samuel Tran <stran@amnh.org>
Subject: Re: BDB vs. HDB
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2005 20:28:06 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <42DEE6E4.3030603@amnh.org>
References: <1109869284.8321.7.camel@d80h243> <422751F5.3060803@symas.com> <42DEE6E4.3030603@amnh.org>

--On Wednesday, July 20, 2005 8:05 PM -0400 Samuel Tran <stran@amnh.org> wrote:

So HDB should be used instead of BDB in OL 2.3.x, am I correct?


There is no such requirement, no.

I am planning an upgrade from 2.2.23 to 2.3.4. I thought it might a good
time to switch from BDB to HDB.

As with anything, I would check the behavior of your database under both BDB and HDB to see which works best for your situation.

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

"These censorship operations against schools and libraries are stronger
than ever in the present religio-political climate. They often focus on
fantasy and sf books, which foster that deadly enemy to bigotry and blind
faith, the imagination." -- Ursula K. Le Guin

References:
- Re: BDB vs. HDB
  - From: Samuel Tran <stran@amnh.org>

Prev by Date: Re: invalid structural object class chain (inetOrgPerson/fw1person)
Next by Date: Re: invalid structural object class chain (inetOrgPerson/fw1person)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread