[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Syncrepl vs. replication
On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> > The slurpd replication mechanism probably ran out of steam a long time
> > ago. I'm on the verge of completely replacing it with syncrepl in 2.3,
> > as slurpd itself is not viable in the dynamic config environment.
> Noted; thanks. After studying the documentation it looks like it will
> support what we want to do, without introducing any surprises.
And not only was it easy to set up, it worked first time! Seeing the
slave directories get populated all by themselves (I had deliberately
cleaned them out) was amazing.
Many thanks to all who worked on SyncRepl.
Dave Horsfall DTM VK2KFU firstname.lastname@example.org Ph: +61 2 8425-5508 (d) -5500 (sw)
Corinthian Engineering, Level 1, 401 Pacific Hwy, Artarmon, NSW 2064, Australia