[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ACI?

Pierangelo Masarati writes:
>Ted Kaczmarek wrote:
>>Is openldap with aci enabled still considered development?
> (...) In 2.3, some effort is being put in determining if they
> suffer from deadlocking, and apparently they don't; I cannot say the
> same for erlier releases because no such testing has been done
> consistently, AFAIK.

I thought that was 'access ... by set='.  It's 'by aci' too?