[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Justification for BDB vs RDBMS

To: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Subject: Re: Justification for BDB vs RDBMS
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2005 16:01:02 -0800
Cc: Gavin Henry <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>, openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <42265351.2080102@symas.com>
References: <200503022320.24418.ghenry@suretecsystems.com> <42265351.2080102@symas.com>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a6) Gecko/20050111

Howard Chu wrote:

When you have the freedom to choose the best solution, you go with back-bdb.

Actually, I should say back-hdb. Even more efficient than back-bdb, and handles subtree renames.

--
 -- Howard Chu
 Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
 http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
 Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support

References:
- Justification for BDB vs RDBMS
  - From: Gavin Henry <ghenry@suretecsystems.com>
- Re: Justification for BDB vs RDBMS
  - From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>

Prev by Date: ignore server cert verification.
Next by Date: Re: Justification for BDB vs RDBMS
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread