[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: registeredAddress, postalAddress and homePostalAddress trouble

Quoting Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>:

--On Thursday, February 10, 2005 6:17 AM +0100 pascal@linuxorable.net wrote:

"Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org> a écrit :

Various list matching rules are not implemented, hence any
assertion of these rules will evaluate to Undefined.

So, you think that postalAddress is not implemented ?
I found that curious, because it is commonly used.

No, the substring index rule for postalAddress is not implemented.

specifically for this case: caseIgnoreListSubstringsMatch

Sorry, I'm realy not a LDAP master. Then, does "caseIgnore<index>Match" means the index is not defined ? and if that true, does it means I can't do a search on the related attribute ?



Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

"These censorship operations against schools and libraries are stronger
than ever in the present religio-political climate. They often focus on
fantasy and sf books, which foster that deadly enemy to bigotry and blind
faith, the imagination." -- Ursula K. Le Guin

---------------------------------------------------------------- This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.