[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: OL and large databases

To: BAILLEUX Benoit RD-BIZZ-CAE <benoit.bailleux@francetelecom.com>
Subject: Re: OL and large databases
From: Howard Chu <hyc@symas.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:04:11 -0800
Cc: openldap-software <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
In-reply-to: <941BA0BF46DB8F4983FF7C8AFE800BC201B36614@ftrdmel3.rd.francetelecom.fr>
References: <941BA0BF46DB8F4983FF7C8AFE800BC201B36614@ftrdmel3.rd.francetelecom.fr>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8a5) Gecko/20041101

BAILLEUX Benoit RD-BIZZ-CAE wrote:

Is there here someone that has an experience of the behaviour of
OpenLDAP with large databases ?
I would like to know if someone can report (even briefly) on the use of
OL with several millions of entries ...
TIA.

In general, slapd performance is fine when properly tuned. However, loading such large databases with slapadd is very slow. Some changes to remedy this will be in OpenLDAP 2.3.

--
 -- Howard Chu
 Chief Architect, Symas Corp.       Director, Highland Sun
 http://www.symas.com               http://highlandsun.com/hyc
 Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support

Follow-Ups:
- Re: OL and large databases
  - From: Zhanbo Xiong <zhanbo.xiong@gmail.com>

References:
- OL and large databases
  - From: "BAILLEUX Benoit RD-BIZZ-CAE" <benoit.bailleux@francetelecom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: subtree vs. onelevel performance?
Next by Date: Re: LDAp performance limites to 50 searchs /s?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread