[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: ldapsearch supportedSASLMechanisms : ANONYMOUS is missing
At 10:53 PM 1/9/2005, Turbo Fredriksson wrote:
>>>>>> "FM" == FM <dist-list@LEXUM.UMontreal.CA> writes:
> FM> Thank you for the input, So the "supportedSASLMechanisms :
> FM> ANONYMOUS" is not needed ?
>Yes. It (clients) needs to be able do do some anonymous searches
>before it can authenticate a user..
Then just allow LDAP anonymous searches, but don't bother
with the SASL ANONYMOUS mechanism.