Re: ACLs: 'and' clause in ACLs

[Fabio Spelta <spelta@linux.it>]

Thank you very much for your reply.

Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> See the "<control>" field in slapd.access(5); for example (RE22/HEAD):
>
> access to *
>     by dn.exact="cn=foo" =rw continue
>     by peername.ip="127.0.0.1" +0 stop
>     by * auth
>
> gives "rw" (read + write) access to "cn=foo", and confirms it if the
> request comes from "127.0.0.1" (the "break" is redundant, of course);
> otherwise, privileges are reset to "auth", which applies to "*".

I forgot a little detail: we are using version 2.0.27 (duh).
We replaced peername.ip with peername, this way it's been accepted by 
slapd. Unfortunately it doesnt work, as it even refuses to bind. 
Replacing =rw with "write" didn't make it either.
Any further help appreciated.

Thank you very much