[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: small problem building 2.2.17 with BerkeleyDB.4.2
--On 19 October 2004 22:52 +0800 "Tay, Gary" <Gary_Tay@platts.com> wrote:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH is specific to Solaris. "vi /etc/ld.so.conf; ldconfig" is
the RedHat equivalent."man ldconfig" for more info.
I'd already edited ld.so.conf and run ldconfig
I think there were past discussions on "BDB version mismatch" issue in
the MailList and FAQ that Alex could search.
Found 2 entries relating to BDB mismatch in the archive and I'd already
tried building BDB with the --with-uniquename option
But, thanks to this list i've got a lot of other things to try now
From: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org on behalf of Buchan Milne
Sent: Tue 10/19/2004 8:06 PM
Cc: Alex Sharaz; openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: small problem building 2.2.17 with BerkeleyDB.4.2
Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> You didn't check the real cause of your problem in config.log, did
you? I > suspect you also need to set CPFLAGS=-I<path to berkeley
headers>; also, > the library paths uually go in LDFLAGS; I don't know
where LDPATH comes > from, maybe I'm missing something...
It should be LD_LIBRARY_PATH, since in 2.2.x, configure tries to run the
compiled program (IIRC in 2.1.x it did just tried to link it).
Buchan Milne Senior Support Technician
Obsidian Systems http://www.obsidian.co.za
B.Eng RHCE (803004789010797)
Sent using Mulberry 3.1.2