[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: ldapi security level?
At 10:16 PM 7/5/2004, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>man, 05.07.2004 kl. 21.12 skrev Kurt D. Zeilenga:
>> So, maybe, some don't consider ldapi:// to be "more secure"
>> than TLS with a "strong" TLS cipher. I find myself using
>> TLS (with strong ciphers) over ldapi://. I don't find
>> that all that strange.
>Not often I'm taken aback, but ... How on earth do you do this?
ldapsearch -H ldapi:/// -ZZ ...
>2.2.x on 2 different rigs (ldap.conf has 'uri
>ldapi://%2fusr%2flocal%2fvar%2fslapd%2fldapi/'), I get:
>1134 [root:billy.demon.nl] /etc/postfix/maps # ldapsearch -ZZ -x
>ldap_start_tls: Connect error (-11)
> additional info: TLS: hostname does not match CN in peer
This error has little to do with the use of ldapi://, just
your run of the mill certificate verification failure.
>More important, perhaps: Why would you want to?
To ease my paranoia... or simply to take advantage of
TLS services such as mutual or server-only certificate-based