[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: slapd and high system load

To: scott.walker@magma.ca
Subject: Re: slapd and high system load
From: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 17:13:46 -0700
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <40E2FCDF.3050707@magma.ca>
References: <40D07B0B.6080304@wfu.edu> <40E1B46C.8040707@magma.ca> <20040629214209.15f80528.georg.klein@gmx.info> <40E2E2CB.1070602@magma.ca> <8AB4393E94D8511C9F9FA72E@cadabra-dsl.stanford.edu> <40E2FCDF.3050707@magma.ca>

--On Wednesday, June 30, 2004 1:48 PM -0400 Scott Walker <scott.walker@magma.ca> wrote:

Thanks Quanah,
I ran at loglevel 256 for awhile during this week, all
queries were for billingNumber, uid, uidNumber and gidNumber.
Which I believe are all indexed properly:

index   billingNumber pres,sub,eq
index   uid pres,sub,eq
index   uidNumber pres,eq
index   gidNumber pres,eq
index   cn pres,sub,eq
index   sn pres,sub,eq
index   objectClass pres,eq

I guess the system is just really busy...


Hi Scott,

That might be possible, but I'd like to note that our LDAP servers doing mail queries run at a load of 0.24, even though they are each receiving several hundred thousand queries a day (always several open a second).

What version of OpenLDAP are you using?

Also, please don't email me directly -- Keep it on the list.

--Quanah


--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/Shared Services
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html

Next by Date: index generation failed
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread