[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: OpenLDAP 2.1 (?) on RedHat Enterprise summary
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Pierangelo Masarati wrote:
> Any details on the configuration that might be significant?
No, almost everything is identical between both test "systems"
(single machine two seperate identical SCSI disks used for the "systems").
> e.g. I assume the same underlying database was used, and the
> same indexing was present, and there was no extra load on the
> machine, and the cache size was the same in both cases, and
> the same cache initial status was obtained.
Yep, and the same database files themselves were used too.
> I'm testing with latest 2.1, 2.2 and HEAD code, for obvious
> reasons; stock rpms are not a choice. I'm going to run similar
> tests on both distributions ASAP.
Well, the results I gave you were the ones RH wanted, I did tests on
2.1.25/db-220.127.116.11 as well which exhibited the same behaviour.