[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: Rejected update for an attribute that wasn't being updated?
--On Friday, April 16, 2004 8:05 PM -0700 Howard Chu <firstname.lastname@example.org>
The entry in question *does* carry a suResidenceTSO attribute, and
apparently none of the objectclasses of the entry allow it. Most likely
this entry was created by slapadd without any schema checking. As I've
noted in the past, the server performs a full schema check during any
modification, and so it can complain about attributes that aren't touched
by the modification, if they exist in the entry but aren't allowed by the
suResidenceRequiredAttribute: 10 063 2F*1A
suResidenceTSO: 10 063 2F*1A
The *unmodified* entry contains the above attributes. As I noted before,
all that the objectClass "suCampusResident" requires is
suResidenceRequiredAttribute. That is present in the entry (see above).
Also, we *always* have schema checking on (it has been in our slapd.conf
since the day we deployed OpenLDAP into production).
I'll also note that the entry was *successfully* modified on 1/11/2004, and
created 05/16/2003. So what you are saying doesn't make any sense.
Principal Software Developer
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html