[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: syncrepl entryUUID syncrepl strangeness.



--On Friday, April 16, 2004 9:41 AM +0100 Martin Evans <m.d.t.evans@qmul.ac.uk> wrote:

On Thu, 2004-04-15 at 18:28, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote: 
--On Thursday, April 15, 2004 2:50 PM +0100 Martin Evans
<m.d.t.evans@qmul.ac.uk> wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> My syncrepl consumers seem to have a base64 encoded entryUUID whereas
> the provider does not. Can anyone tell me of this is normal for
> syncrepl, or if it is something I should be concerned about (i.e. start
> an ITS)?

What version of OpenLDAP are you using?  None of my entryUUID's look
like  that under 2.2.8...


2.2.8 with 1 approx matching patch from ITS 3062

bdb backend 4.2.52 + the two patches from the sleepycat download page.

Solaris 8
bash$ uname -a
SunOS chi 5.8 Generic_108528-23 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Blade-100

Configured so:

export CPPFLAGS="-I$DB/include -I/usr/local/include"
export LDFLAGS="-L$DB/lib -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib"
./configure --prefix=$PREFIX\
            --without-cyrus-sasl\
            --enable-crypt

built so:

bash$ gcc -v
Reading specs from
/usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/3.3.2/specs
Configured with: ../configure --with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as
--with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/l d --disable-nls --disable-libgcj
--enable-languages=c,c++
Thread model: posix
gcc version 3.3.2
bash$ ldd libexec/slapd
        libssl.so.0.9.6 =>       /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.0.9.6
        libcrypto.so.0.9.6 =>    /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.0.9.6
        libresolv.so.2 =>        /usr/lib/libresolv.so.2
        libgen.so.1 =>   /usr/lib/libgen.so.1
        libnsl.so.1 =>   /usr/lib/libnsl.so.1
        libsocket.so.1 =>        /usr/lib/libsocket.so.1
        libpthread.so.1 =>       /usr/lib/libpthread.so.1
        libc.so.1 =>     /usr/lib/libc.so.1
        libdl.so.1 =>    /usr/lib/libdl.so.1
        libmp.so.2 =>    /usr/lib/libmp.so.2
        libthread.so.1 =>        /usr/lib/libthread.so.1
        /usr/platform/SUNW,Sun-Blade-100/lib/libc_psr.so.1

Kind regards,
Martin.


Martin,

Keep it on the list, please. ;)

I'm running OL 2.2.8 on Solaris 8 without patches. I wonder if it is in part due to the patches. I will be upgrading to 2.2.10 soon, so I will see if I find the same behavior then as well.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html