[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: benchmarks &real world
"Howard Chu" wrote:
I've played with DirectoryMark a few times, after seeing it bandied about.
fact, the data set that it uses is randomly generated, so there is no
canonical fixed data set. Nor is there a standardized job mix or load
In articles I've seen that report DirectoryMark figures, these critical
parameters are not included. As such, none of the published results I've
seen could be compared to any concrete reference, which makes the usage of
DirectoryMark rather meaningless.
Well, what other/better benchmark do you suggest then ?
Protect your PC - get McAfee.com VirusScan Online