[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldap proxy to AD returns no results - take#2

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: ldap proxy to AD returns no results - take#2
From: Dieter Kluenter <dieter@dkluenter.de>
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:56:11 +0200
In-reply-to: <3D564E73B6DF994EBABD985F4469D5396D7077@kccxoex06.corp.kpmgconsulting.com> (Tim Lank's message of "Wed, 14 Apr 2004 10:58:03 +0100")
References: <3D564E73B6DF994EBABD985F4469D5396D7077@kccxoex06.corp.kpmgconsulting.com>
User-agent: Gnus/5.1001 (Gnus v5.10.1) XEmacs/21.4 (Portable Code, linux)

Hi,

"Lank, Tim" <tim.lank@bearingpoint.com> writes:

> Thanks again Pierangelo.
>
> So what you are saying if I'm not mistaken is that the examples on
> pages 210-213 (most specifically p. 212) of Gerald Carter's O'reilly
> book on LDAP System Administration should not actually work and that
> is how back-ldap is designed?

[...]

I just grabbed this book, the examples in question refer to a simple
bind to AD , back-ldap takes this credentials to bind to the remote
server.

(ldapsearch -H ldap://ad.plainjoe.org -x \
-D "ldap-proxy@ad.plainjoe.org" -w proxy-secret)

So this is a correct example.
But I must admit, the first few lines on page 211, referring to
binddn, are wrong.  

-Dieter
-- 
Dieter Kluenter  | Systemberatung
Tel:040.64861967 | Fax: 040.64891521
mailto: dkluenter(at)dkluenter.de
http://www.avci.de

References:
- RE: ldap proxy to AD returns no results - take#2
  - From: "Lank, Tim" <tim.lank@bearingpoint.com>

Prev by Date: Antwort: MAC OS X clients and OpenLDAP [Virus checked]
Next by Date: Re: ldap problem
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread