[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Stanford moves to OL 2.2.6 for production
--On Thursday, March 04, 2004 4:10 PM -0500 email@example.com wrote:
Thanks for the comment about the move from Hash to Btree indices, as well
as your performance metrics. I wonder what the reasoning was for doing
this. Developers, any answers on this?
If you want to re-enable the Hash indexing, it looks like if you add
-DBDB_INDEX_USE_HASH to your CFLAGS, it will set it back to using the
Hash based method. FYI.
The reason was to improve indexing performance, which Btree definitely
Principal Software Developer
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html