Re: ldap_add: Naming violation (64)

[King Lung Chiu <csklc@farrer.hpc.csiro.au>]

Hi Quanah,

thanks for the reply,

> > where ldif.eg looks like:
> >
> >  dn:dc=hpc,dc=csiro,dc=au
> >  objectclass:top
> >  objectclass:organizationalUnit
> >  ou:hpc
...
> 
> Yes, it should be:
> 
> dn: ou=hpc,dc=csiro,dc=au
> ou: hpc
> objectclass: top
> objectclass: organizationalUnit

Does that mean my dn shouldn't have been "dc=hpc,dc=csiro,dc=au"?

How do  I decide what format to use for a dn? (eg. quickstart example from 
openldap's site used "dn: dc=example,dc=com", whereas your post above 
seems to suggest it should be "dn: ou=example,dc=com")

thanks again, cheers,

King Lung Chiu