Re: Library version naming confusion

[Tony Earnshaw <tonye@billy.demon.nl>]

lør, 21.02.2004 kl. 22.00 skrev Jens Vagelpohl:

> If the goal is to minimize the deviation from the "factory standard" 
> set of distribution RPMs (this minimizing the admin work) then changing 
> all dependent RPMs to follow the new naming conventions for this single 
> set of libraries is, IMHO, unfeasible. It would mean that instead of 
> worrying about a small set of RPMs I am trading that for having to 
> rebuild a much larger set every single time.
> 
> I'm looking for a (hopefully) clean way to "bend" the OpenLDAP build to 
> my needs as far as library naming goes, that's all.

Sounds reasonable, maybe you could better ask on the Openldap developer
list.

Best,

--Tonni

-- 

mail: billy - at - billy.demon.nl
http://www.billy.demon.nl