[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

AW: Problems with EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch

Thank you both! Works perfectly now!

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
[mailto:owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org] Im Auftrag von Quanah
Gibson-Mount
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Februar 2004 20:19
An: Jon Roberts; Thomas Stinner
Cc: OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
Betreff: Re: Problems with EQUALITY generalizedTimeMatch




--On Tuesday, February 17, 2004 12:41 PM -0600 Jon Roberts 
<man@mentata.com> wrote:

> Try an ORDERING clause to your attribute definitions, like:
>
> ORDERING numericStringOrderingMatch
>
> See also:
>
> http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin22/schema.html#Extending%20Schema
>
> which I notice doesn't list the generalizedTimeMatch syntax.

        ORDERING generalizedTimeOrderingMatch

is the syntax.

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Developer
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
ITSS/TSS/Infrastructure Operations
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html