[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: LDAP TWiki
My comment about bandwidth was due to name confusion; Kirk Strausser said
"honeypot.net" and I heard "honeynet.org"!
The Honeynet Project at honeynet.org is not affiliated with honeypot.net and
thus my remark doesn't make any sense at all. Sorry. Entirely my fault,
apologies to Kirk and the list at large!
On 16 Jan 2004 at 8:19, Douglas Furlong wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 20:02, Kirk Strauser wrote:
> > At 2004-01-15T18:00:34Z, "Medievalist" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > > Er, won't honeypot.net effectively have highly variable bandwidth? Just
> > > asking, you understand, not criticizing.
> > I'm not sure I understand the question. It has 256Kbps upstream, stably,
> > which should by ample for a text-driven site.
> If need be, I have some public webspace with reasonable bandwidth
> limitations (currently hosting DC-GUI RPM's for redhat, and it deals
> with that traffic fine).
> A text only site should not increase the overal consumption.
> If any one would like me to set this up, let me know and I will