[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ldap add
I think this is a clear case of one
hearing "apples" when the other said
"oranges".
The naming attributes are those in the
RDN; so Kurt meant that there's no need
to add the "dc: com" value because it's
not in the RDN (by the way, AFAIR "dc"
is single-valued, so this is another
error in that example)
Your example simply doesn't work because,
for what I can get from your mail,
"qwidoApp" is an objectClass, so its
use as an attributeType in an attribute
value assertion is totally meaningless.
p.
>> less "dc: com".
>
> oh ?
>
> ldif:
>
> dn: qwidoApp=qwido
> objectClass: qwidoApp
> qwidoVersion: 2.00
> cn: The Big Boss
> userPassword: secretively
>
> ldapadding this ldif:
>
> adding new entry "qwidoApp=qwido"
> ldapadd: update failed: qwidoApp=qwido
> ldap_add: Naming violation (64)
> additional info: naming attribute 'qwidoApp' is not present in
> entry
>
> Care to explain why 'dc: com' is not needed in Sonjay's example ?
>
> I mean, of course I take your word for it, but I just don't understand.
> (RTFM? Again ?)
>
> Would a root node like this work (with the appropriate suffix in
> slapd.conf):
>
> dn: qwidoSomething=whatever,qwidoApp=qwido
> objectClass: qwidoApp
> qwidoVersion: 2.00
> cn: The Big Boss
> userPassword: secretively
> qwidoSomething: whatever
>
>>
>> Sonjay, see the Quick Start Guide for an up-to-date tutorial.
>
> - From the updated Quick Start Guide, which is aptly named:
> http://www.openldap.org/doc/admin22/quickstart.html
>
> 'The following is a quick start guide to OpenLDAP 2.1 software,
> including the stand-alone LDAP daemon, slapd(8)'.
--
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it