[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: Question about Cygwin OpenLDAP
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SerpentMage (Christian Gross) [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
> Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:47 PM
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: Re: Question about Cygwin OpenLDAP
> Matthew Hardin wrote:
> >I forgot to mention- We advise against using Cygwin due to its
> >overhead; using MinGW is better for real deployments.
> Ok... But it is an absolute pain to compile... So in a sense you did
> answer the other part of my question, which was the MinGW compilation.
> I am in the process of converting the steps into a script, but it is not
> done yet. Do you have the script locally?
Sorry, no. We did the steps once and maintain a build environment
specifically for that.
> The instructions about patching the gcc compiler, are they still
> relative? MinGW and Cygwin seem to have moved on, and I am wondering
> how relevant all of those steps are.
The gcc compiler itself appears to have been fixed, but it is still
necessary to create the one-line script (mgcc) mentioned in the compilation
> Christian Gross