[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: does 'cn' have to be the same as in 'dn' ?

To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
Subject: Re: does 'cn' have to be the same as in 'dn' ?
From: Bernard Massot <bmassot@free.fr>
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 18:49:04 +0200
Content-disposition: inline
In-reply-to: <00d701c373ab$5b087a70$1e06a8c0@gringo>
References: <938BDCE792A46245AB40A7A87D7312DD022A9124@GAATLP19W.corp.aglrsc.com> <00d701c373ab$5b087a70$1e06a8c0@gringo>
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i-nntp3

Please stop screwing the threads !!
-- 
Bernard Massot

Attachment: pgpLtRMqD9C3o.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- RE: Front end to openldap?
  - From: "Lee Clemmer" <lclemmer@aglresources.com>
- does 'cn' have to be the same as in 'dn' ?
  - From: "Grzegorz Filip" <fliper_@poczta.onet.pl>

Prev by Date: Re: Use "groupOfNames" to create distribution list with no success
Next by Date: Slapd and postgres problem
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread