[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?

To: u.drolshagen@t-online.de
Subject: Re: 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?
From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 2003 14:14:40 +0200
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <200307071352.21953.u.drolshagen@t-online.de>
References: <02cc01c34468$2760d1d0$0200000a@tkodog.noip.com> <3F0945A4.2090405@stroeder.com> <200307071352.21953.u.drolshagen@t-online.de>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425

Ulrich Drolshagen wrote:

Am Montag, 7. Juli 2003 12:04 schrieb Michael Ströder:
Joe Wong wrote:
I see that most of the Linux distro is still including openldap 2.0.x
They are not up to date.
AFAIK 2.1 doesn't support crypt-passwords anymore. Is that right?


I don't think so. configure --help still lists it.

    --enable-crypt        enable crypt(3) passwords [no]

Default is [no] though. You probably have to explicitly enable it in your setup.

Ciao, Michael.

References:
- 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?
  - From: "Joe Wong" <joewong@tkodog.no-ip.com>
- Re: 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?
  - From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Re: 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?
  - From: U.Drolshagen@t-online.de (Ulrich Drolshagen)

Prev by Date: Re: 2.0 or 2.1 for production system?
Next by Date: Re: Host-based login-shell
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread