Re: 2.1.17 performance issues

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@stanford.edu>]

--On Wednesday, April 23, 2003 5:51 PM -0300 Andreas 
<andreas@conectiva.com.br> wrote:

> On Wed, Apr 16, 2003 at 11:59:06AM -0700, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
> > > And this is all running with "cachesize 10000000," although we don't
> > > have enough entries to fill that large a cache anyway, on top of the
> > > default bdb install.
> >
> > John,
> >
> > As per one of my previous emails, the cachesize directive in slapd.conf
> > has  no bearing on BDB.
>
> Are you sure about this? The slapd-bdb(5) manpage says this is a valid
> directive for bdb:
>
>        cachesize <integer>
>               Specify the size in entries of the in-memory cache
> maintained by               the BDB backend database instance.  The
> default is 1000 entries.

Sorry, you are correct.  I was thinking of the BDB cache size itself (which 
with LDBM can be set by dbcachesize).

--Quanah

--
Quanah Gibson-Mount
Senior Systems Administrator
ITSS/TSS/Computing Systems
Stanford University
GnuPG Public Key: http://www.stanford.edu/~quanah/pgp.html