[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

RE: DefaultSearchBase / ForceSearchBase

To: <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>
Subject: RE: DefaultSearchBase / ForceSearchBase
From: "Pierangelo Masarati" <ando@sys-net.it>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 21:35:25 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: <hyc@highlandsun.com>, <mathias.meisfjordskar@usit.uio.no>, <ldap@mitchiner.net>, <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <5.2.0.9.0.20030404105910.0239a450@127.0.0.1>
References: <y6wznn6f7lm.fsf@dumbo.uio.no> <5.2.0.9.0.20030404105910.0239a450@127.0.0.1>

> At 10:41 AM 4/4/2003, Howard Chu wrote:
>>Support for suffixalias was dropped in 2.1.6. (Six, not sixteen!) If it
>> ever returns, it will be sometime in the 2.2 releases. In this
>> particular case you can fix the problem using back-ldap to forward
>> requests from the bad searchbase to the correct one. But it would be
>> smarter for you to fix the clients.
>
> Or you can use referrals (possibly with back-glue)...

I suspect broken clients would hardly
benefit from receiving referrals ...

p.

-- 
Pierangelo Masarati
mailto:pierangelo.masarati@sys-net.it

References:
- Re: DefaultSearchBase / ForceSearchBase
  - From: Mathias Meisfjordskar <mathias.meisfjordskar@usit.uio.no>
- RE: DefaultSearchBase / ForceSearchBase
  - From: "Kurt D. Zeilenga" <Kurt@OpenLDAP.org>

Prev by Date: Re: OpenLDAP: Fatal error when "make install"
Next by Date: openldap 2.0 server and paged requests
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread