[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

objectClasses and migrating to 2.1.x

I see lots of examples in the documentation where entries have a full swag
of objectClass attributes e.g.

  sn: Jensen
  cn: Babs Jensen
  objectClass: top
  objectClass: person

Yet in our 2.0.25 directory, we merely have e.g.:

  sn: Fred
  cn: Fred Nerk
  objectClass: person

i.e. without the "top".  There are in fact many such entries without "top"
(and I was not around when they were made).  I note that "GQ" insists upon
having "top" etc.

I suspect this will cause trouble when migrating to 2.1.x, right?

Dave Horsfall  DTM  VK2KFU  daveh@ci.com.au  Ph: +61 2 9906-7866  Fx: 9906-1556
Corinthian Engineering, Level 1, 401 Pacific Hwy, Artarmon, NSW 2064, Australia