RE: Error to get LDAP_OPT_API_INFO

["Bennett, Tony - CNF" <Bennett.Tony@cnf.com>]

My version of openldap is 2.1.8 and 
its development tree contains a program named apitest
located in ./libraries/libldap.

apitest.c contains samples of numerous calls as well
as showing what the compile-time and execution
time parms are.

You might take a look at it if it is present in 
your version.

-tony


> -----Original Message-----
> From: German Poo Caaman~o [mailto:gpoo@ubiobio.cl] 
> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 8:28 PM
> To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> Subject: Re: Error to get LDAP_OPT_API_INFO
> 
> 
> El mié, 15-01-2003 a las 00:15, German Poo Caaman~o escribió:
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I'm trying to get the version with a small C program, 
> > however ldap_get_options always returns an error, I'm
> > still can't see where is the problem. I can get other
> > options, such as, LDAP_OPT_HOST_NAME, but not the version.
> > 
> > I made an small test program, quite simple.  I'll appreaciate
> > any hint.
> > 
> > My server:
> > ii  slapd          2.0.27-3       OpenLDAP server (slapd).
> 
> Well, After that I took a look the source code of
> libraries/libldap/options.c
> (ldap_get_option implementation), at line 109 the following code:
> 
> switch(option) {
> case LDAP_OPT_API_INFO: {
> 	struct ldapapiinfo *info = (struct ldapapiinfo *) outvalue;
> 
> 	if(info == NULL) {
> 	/* outvalue must point to an apiinfo structure /
> 		return LDAP_OPT_ERROR;			}
> 
> 	if(info->ldapai_info_version != LDAP_API_INFO_VERSION) {
> 		/* api info version mismatch */
> 		info->ldapai_info_version = LDAP_API_INFO_VERSION;
> 		return LDAP_OPT_ERROR;
> 	}
> ...
> 
> I set:
> 
> ldapinfo.ldapai_info_version = LDAP_API_INFO_VERSION;
> 
> before to call ldap_get_option, and it works.  However,
> I'm getting:
> 
> vendor: OpenLDAP version: 20026
> 
> I was expecting 20027.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> German Poo Caaman~o
> mailto:gpoo@ubiobio.cl
> http://www.ubiobio.cl/~gpoo/chilelindo.html
> "Hay 10 tipos de personas: las que entienden binario y las que no."
>