I found the problem. I had whitespace in front of: rootpw secret In the slapd.conf file. I removed the whitespace and restarted ldap, tested ldapadd and it worked fine. Thanks to everyone who responded earlier! -----Original Message----- From: Bennett, Tony - CNF [mailto:Bennett.Tony@cnf.com] Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 11:15 AM To: 'Gerry Maddock'; openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org Subject: RE: daemon: bind(6) failed errno=98 (Address already in use) This looks like an IPv6 issue... Look at: http://www.openldap.org/faq/data/cache/652.html and http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200211/msg00384.html -tony > -----Original Message----- > From: Gerry Maddock [mailto:email@example.com] > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 7:43 AM > To: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org > Subject: daemon: bind(6) failed errno=98 (Address already in use) > Importance: High > > I know this problem has been addressed before, but I was > unable to find an answer that made any sense. I have > openldap-2.0.21-1 on a RH7.2 sys with pretty much the > defaults on the slapd.conf file (the only parts changed were > adding my domain name to the examples) I can post the > slapd.conf if needed, but as stated earlier it's the RH > default slapd with only my domain name added in. > Ok, when I run: slapd -d 256 I get: > > slapd -d 256 > daemon: socket() failed errno=97 (Address family not > supported by protocol) > daemon: bind(6) failed errno=98 (Address already in use) > daemon: bind(6) failed > slapd stopped. > connections_destroy: nothing to destroy > > > ON previous mails, I see people stating that another process > is using port 389. I then ran netstat -nat| grep 389 and saw: > tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:389 0.0.0.0:* > LISTEN > > I then killed ldap with: service ldap stop and reran netstat > to see if that port was still in use and it wasn't: > Netstat -nat|grep 389 returned no results. > > I then checked to ensure all firewalling programs were killed: > service ipchains stop > service iptables stop > service portsentry stop > > I then restart ldap (service ldap start), try to use ldapadd, > and as usual, nothing. > I'm at a loss here, if there is anyone who can help me it > would be greatly appreciated.