[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: RFC2739 calEntry schema
> >>> I would like to keep up the discussion if IA5String is the correct
> >>> SYNTAX for the attibutes in it.
> >>> Maybe Directory String would be better (although it is contrary to what
> >>> the RFC says).
> >> Can you give an example of which you think that it would require
> >> DirectoryString instead of ia5string?
> > Where the URI is not an expression of English. URI (URLs) can be unicode.
> URIs (at least when speaking of those defined in RFC 2396) can only be
> *unic, ie. a subset of ASCII.
Maybe, but RFC2181, a now entrenched standard, states that a DNS name
can be any string with no particular relationship to ascii.