[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: Only Openldap 2.1.x support TLS ?
man, 2002-11-11 kl. 22:52 skrev Howard Chu:
> > AFAIk, after communication with others and having been on
> > this list for
> > a while, 2.0.x has no encryption (SSL or TLS) or otherwise advanced
> > authentication possibility and has to use /usr/sbin/stunnel for
> > encrypted connections (man stunnel), whilst 2.1.x has a *lot* of added
> > functionality, including full SASL.
> No. 2.0.x and 2.1.x have mostly identical support for SSL/TLS, it's just that
> the man pages and admin guide never got updated with these features in 2.0.
> There are probably some bug fixes in 2.1 tls.c that never made it back to 2.0
> but for the most part they're the same. All the TLS configuration keywords
> documented for ldap.conf and slapd.conf in 2.1 are identical in 2.0. 2.1 has
> much better support for SASL/EXTERNAL though.
I'll take that on board, thanks!
Cricketers are strange people. They wake up
in October, only to find that their wives had
left them in May.