[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: Question on aliases [was: Re: Tree structure]

To: Kev Buckley <k.buckley@lancaster.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Question on aliases [was: Re: Tree structure]
From: Tony Earnshaw <tonni@billy.demon.nl>
Date: 06 Nov 2002 20:04:24 +0100
Cc: openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
In-reply-to: <E189NyM-000149-00@cent1.lancs.ac.uk>
References: <E189NyM-000149-00@cent1.lancs.ac.uk>

ons, 2002-11-06 kl. 12:03 skrev Kev Buckley:

> 2) Have I missed something (everything ?) in my understanding of the
>     alias mechanism that solves, or maybe even negates the other question.

Basically:

1: You grabbed someone else's thread from aeons (october 14th) ago;
2: You don't tell us anything about your system, zilch;
3: Aliases don't even work properly with Openldap 2.1.8 and BDB 4.1.24.

> Thanks for any pointers,

Hmmm ...

Best,

Tony

-- 

Tony Earnshaw

Det er mangt som vert sagt, som betre kunde
vorti usagt.

e-post:		tonni@billy.demon.nl
www:		http://www.billy.demon.nl

References:
- Question on aliases [was: Re: Tree structure]
  - From: Kev Buckley <k.buckley@lancaster.ac.uk>

Prev by Date: DS on SunOS (Binary), Client on windows
Next by Date: Re: openldap schema for enabling Calendaring (support for free-busy times)
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread