[Date Prev][Date Next]
RE: Follow up: 2.1.4, solaris 8, fails to start
We (Symas Corp.) have pre-built binaries for Solaris 7 and 8, HPUX 11, and
AIX 4.2.1. The newest stuff isn't on our web site yet because we're still
testing the integrated package. We provide OpenLDAP 2.1.5, Cyrus SASL 2.1.7,
Heimdal 0.4d, OpenSSL 0.9.6g, and BerkeleyDB 4.1.24. We also have pam_ldap
152 and nss_ldap 201. Most of the packages are off the shelf but we've also
made some bugfixes to these packages to get them playing together correctly.
(If you follow the relevant mailing lists you'll have seen the fixes we've
submitted already.) I expect the full set of packages will be finished
testing and freely available on our web site sometime next week. (Things are
going well, but this is a lot of code to build and we're a small company; it
takes a while to verify that each piece is working.)
-- Howard Chu
Chief Architect, Symas Corp. Director, Highland Sun
Symas: Premier OpenSource Development and Support
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org
> [mailto:owner-openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org]On Behalf Of Fred Johnson
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:54 PM
> To: OpenLDAP-software@OpenLDAP.org
> Subject: RE: Follow up: 2.1.4, solaris 8, fails to start
> We're having a similar set of problems building 2.1.5,
> and we are finding that we really don't want to become
> subject-matter experts in the construction and tesing
> of OpenLDAP. Is anyone out there aware of pre-compiled
> OpenLDAP binaries for Solaris 2.7 and 2.8? We need
> support for OpenSSL and SASL and we'd prefer a base on
> Thanks in advance,
> Fred Johnson IT Specialist
> McMurdo International Specialties
> trying to build again, this time dropping the ldbm
> stuff. Because I
> can't get any worse right now, I'm also trying
> --with-tls --enable-wrappers.
> (I already put tcp wrappers and openssl on the box).
> We'll see how that
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Igor Brezac [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 12:12
> To: Andrew Diederich
> Cc: openLDAP (E-mail)
> Subject: RE: Follow up: 2.1.4, solaris 8, fails to
> On Thu, 26 Sep 2002, Andrew Diederich wrote:
> > So far:
> > I've been running the berkeley db tests all night,
> and they haven't found
> > any issues yet. So, I'm guessing that it wasn't a
> bad berekely build.
> > Looking through my notes, I've had less success with
> the tests after
> > --enable-ldbm -with-ldbm-api=berkeley. I see that
> ldbm isn't on by
> > with configure, but bdb (Berkeley DB backend) is. I
> don't really
> > the difference.
> > In my openldap 1.2.7 box, I have a "database ldbm"
> line. In my initial
> > configuring and building of 2.1.[4|5], I have a
> database bdb line instead.
> > What's the difference to me, especially if I go and
> make berkeley the ldbm
> > api?
> bdb is a new and recommended backend type. 'make
> test' seems to want
> ldbm. If you are not going to use ldbm backend type,
> you can remove it
> from the build.
> Openldap 2.1.5 and both berkeley 4.0.14 and 4.1.24
> build fine on Solaris 8
> and 9 (Sparc). I use gcc 2.95.3. Unfortunately, I do
> not know why you
> are not able to succefully build the latest version of
> openldap. :(
> Do you Yahoo!?
> New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo!