[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: Back-END Problem
Paulo Angelo <email@example.com> writes:
> I tried to use OpenLDAP w/ ldbm, and its very slow when you put
> ~20.000 entries in the base,
this is one problem (if i understand).
> a select here tooked about 45 seconds,
> using MySQL as back-end a query is about 50 times faster.
this another one.
> if i use Posgres, i wont have ACLs,
It seems to not be necessarily a Postgresql problem: any sql-backend
have ACLs problem with non read operations.
> What should I use?
Good question. Better, what do you want to do ?
Assuming that ldap/ldbm fits your needs (independently of performances
needs), maybe one helps if you give your configuration files (indexes,
caches... ) method for your tests (queries...), hardware
Maybe you should read this section before:
I agree, accessing a sgbdr with ldap as an exchange/access protocol, and the
granularity of ACL should be great. Unfortunatly, it appears that
back-sql is a work in progress or an unmaintened one...