[Date Prev][Date Next]
Simple question: ldaps:/// or ldaps://?
- To: maillist-openldap <openldap-software@OpenLDAP.org>
- Subject: Simple question: ldaps:/// or ldaps://?
- From: Susanne Benkert <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2002 09:54:45 +0100
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.6) Gecko/20011120
I use SSL/TLS to secure my Openldap Communication. Therefor I started
/usr/local/openldap/libexec/slapd -h "ldaps:/// ldap:///" -f
like described in the FAQ. In general this works all right, but as I
found out some client programms (like GQ) can't connect with the
Ldapserver, if I started the slapd like this.
..... -h "ldaps:// ldap://" .....
seems to work better. Are there any disadvantages in using this? What is
the main difference between these two ways to start slapd?
As anybody experience in getting the adressbook of Mozilla working with
an Openldap directory? It was running serveral days ago (but only
without SSL/TLS), but now it has a "Server search problem". The thing
is, that I don't know what I changed. - With Netscape the adressbook &
Ldap-stuff works fine. Can't anybody give me some advise?
Thank you and bye