[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: group issues
i did in fact try that. the results weren't quite right. for
instance, say a person was a member of four groups. using the method
you suggested, the system acted as though the user was only in two (or
three?) of the of groups, with precedence going to the groups with the
On Wed, Jul 05, 2000 at 04:50:33PM -0400, Nadeem Hasan wrote:
> How about using both, like here:
> dn: cn=group0,ou=group,dc=domain,dc=edu
> cn: group0
> gidnumber: 5000
> objectclass: top
> objectclass: groupOfNames
> objectclass: posixGroup
> memberuid: member0
> member: uid=member0,ou=people,dc=domain,dc=edu
> blair christensen wrote:
> > hello,
> > openldap 1.2.10, redhat 6.2 (intel) and solaris 8, pam_ldap v65, and
> > nss_ldap v113.
> > i am having numerous problems getting groups to work properly for me.
> > what i would like is to have a group with members specified by full DN
> > that would work with both openldap ACLs and with nss_ldap/pam_ldap for
> > supplementary groups.