[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldapmodify and replace/delete

At 05:27 PM 8/11/99 +0200, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
>Sometime ago, there was a discussion that, using ldapmodify, a replace
>directive should always be followed by a value. 
>(see http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-bugs/9907/msg00016.html). 
>Now I wonder if, in version 1.2.6, this is still the case? 

Yes.  1.x implements U-Mich LDIF.

As noted in my response, I believe this issue is better resolved
in the context of our LDIF2 efforts (part of our 2.0-devel efforts).