[Date Prev][Date Next]
Re: ldapmodify and replace/delete
At 05:27 PM 8/11/99 +0200, Van Liedekerke Franky wrote:
>Sometime ago, there was a discussion that, using ldapmodify, a replace
>directive should always be followed by a value.
>Now I wonder if, in version 1.2.6, this is still the case?
Yes. 1.x implements U-Mich LDIF.
As noted in my response, I believe this issue is better resolved
in the context of our LDIF2 efforts (part of our 2.0-devel efforts).