[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: base dn
At 01:26 PM 4/5/00 -0400, Mike Douglass wrote:
>I started off thinking
> o=Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, c=US
>was the way to go.
If you register this with the appropriate naming authorities (ANSI for c=US)
of the X.500 global directory.
>Then I read a lot of the Stanford stuff (and others). That persuaded me that
> dc=RPI, dc=edu
>was a good thing.
If you are responsible for rpi.edu, then no additional registration
is needed. If not, see hostmaster of rpi.edu.
>
>Now I find that the Netscape documents seem to promote
> o=Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
>or is this just for their Certificate Management System?
I wouldn't recommend such a DN for a naming context even if your
directory was purely private.
>Will I run into problems with dc=rpi, dc=edu?
See past discussion for trade offs (you might check archives of
the ldap@umich.edu list)...
Kurt
- References:
- base dn
- From: Mike Douglass <douglm@rpi.edu>