[Date Prev][Date Next] [Chronological] [Thread] [Top]

Re: ldap and tacacs (source anyone)

To: Adrianus Warmenhoven <warmenho@admin.big-orange.net>
Subject: Re: ldap and tacacs (source anyone)
From: Trever Furnish <trever@monster.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 08:45:34 -0500
Cc: openldap-general@OpenLDAP.org
Organization: Monster.com
References: <Pine.GSO.4.10.9908261420150.1205-100000@avarice.nepean.uws.edu.au> <018201beefa8$573fdd60$4781b38f@admin.bigorange.net>

Um, yes!


Adrianus Warmenhoven wrote:
> 
> Heya,
> 
> we have an TACACS & LDAP solution for over a year now.
> Extended logging, complex queries and all.
> 
> Anyone want source on that?
> 
> Regards,
>                 Adrianus Warmenhoven.
> 
> ---
> 'Change the rules, challenge the future'

--
Trever Furnish, trever@monster.com, postmaster@monster.com
Monster.com Operations, 317.347.1323 or (cell) 317.714.4755

References:
- Re: ldap and tacacs
  - From: David J N Begley <david@avarice.nepean.uws.edu.au>
- Re: ldap and tacacs (source anyone)
  - From: "Adrianus Warmenhoven" <warmenho@admin.big-orange.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Must a simple bind with DN and no pwd be treated as anonymous?
Next by Date: Re: Must a simple bind with DN and no pwd be treated as anonymous?
Index(es):
- Chronological
- Thread