Graham Dunn wrote: > Has anyone managed to work the mail500 definitions into a > mailer/mail500.m4 file suitable for m4 processing? I commit a *prototype* mailer/mail500.m4 just yesterday... http://www.openldap.org/devel/cvsweb.cgi/clients/mail500/mail500.m4 Suggestions/patches for improvements to mail500 would be appreciated. I would suggest discussions concerning such improvements be moved to the -devel list. Kurt