[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ITS review 9/29/2017
- To: Quanah Gibson-Mount <quanah@symas.com>, openldap-devel@openldap.org
- Subject: Re: ITS review 9/29/2017
- From: Michael Ströder <michael@stroeder.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Oct 2017 00:13:46 +0200
- In-reply-to: <E9906014603A8466E8F4AD2C@[192.168.1.30]>
- Openpgp: id=43C8730E84A20E560722806C07DC7AE36A8BC938
- References: <5FB136BF2A2FBB917F7F7F33@[192.168.1.30]> <b7fe1e1b-17e1-0260-998d-e62c5f42c173@stroeder.com> <WM!62999c34cf197ad47063dd2679f842b328d92c190db49487afef1815f533737c71128076a02d60274b88fa7b36ae5d09!@mailstronghold-2.zmailcloud.com> <E9906014603A8466E8F4AD2C@[192.168.1.30]>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:51.0) Gecko/20100101 SeaMonkey/2.48
Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
>>> its8692 - Support LDAP_MOD_INCREMENT with back-sock
>>> <https://github.com/quanah/openldap-scratch/tree/its8692>
>>
>> Why is this super-trivial patch postponed to RE25?
>
> It's a new feature.
This is debatable:
1. OpenLDAP 2.4.x accepts modify operations with LDAP_MOD_INCREMENT
2. OpenLDAP 2.4.x sends modify operations via back-sock to external
listeners
Therefore I'd consider this rather a fix than a new feature.
Ciao, Michael.
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature