[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: ITS8529 -- Inclusion in RE24?
- To: openldap-devel@openldap.org
- Subject: Re: ITS8529 -- Inclusion in RE24?
- From: Ryan Tandy <ryan@nardis.ca>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 11:19:44 -0800
- Content-disposition: inline
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nardis.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=ApWsprKVVGi+oO9pCInkPlS1llzeVG6gHMC2q4CrTz4=; b=Izy5TiJq1+kIjwzTAVzvuxs+F7lTtpes4JCJoHHEjiJtU+Woh/5c/X+nMcYzRcHfe1 MJ7Oz6p5UPjSIbJSHMVTPVuFEjXsxFpfhBO/GlmATfWMUW6RxTfas1Z+a1RcmcljFCql QAYhQYOaX3MjeJqM3ac3HTxSCletPOBO8pHaI=
- In-reply-to: <EADBFDD4EA0DE52B9B4D1F83@[192.168.1.30]>
- References: <EADBFDD4EA0DE52B9B4D1F83@[192.168.1.30]>
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:01:17AM -0800, Quanah Gibson-Mount wrote:
Does anyone have some good concrete reasons why it should not go into RE24?
I think it's a good change for RE24. The error message is clear enough.