[Date Prev][Date Next]
[Chronological]
[Thread]
[Top]
Re: When must slap_callback.sc_writewait be set?
- To: Hallvard Breien Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>
- Subject: Re: When must slap_callback.sc_writewait be set?
- From: Леонид Юрьев <leo@yuriev.ru>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 09:26:55 +0300
- Cc: "OpenLDAP-devel@openldap.org >> OpenLDAP Devel" <openldap-devel@openldap.org>
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yuriev-ru.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=K6kuTPQtZf60meU++CNeLeAVzh2UbdANELZUqk593Uc=; b=RtREh3Yd8T1qhs/06Ou+YofDGdAi7DIokYqUaCUuy+ftkQR05xTwSz9KvhNdKrE5ye XcC5b9Da+mh+OYrDYHfNgv9cGSmwOZs1nWIpeA5Vl+5IIPL0tFRPxpytdd0tOsfk1v8g N+nSDxg1JQSzR5n5ceRDfCcZKv/CE8q1lVf/SAkA9ACqBgi3/SY1S3uMxjwfisfwC8f5 xHD5AgBE3A0DM0jRnqtJ39p/PxpmkG002IbEM4lpntTHtVWu1bSWOWObQyCvQY9kz9Ev C62Ta/aeILzXGKbxIkXj2xmLFPZVGUL1pYJvUB/x9iJLmAR6araab55jgJZfC8mdnErY /fzg==
- In-reply-to: <66bbfed2-7939-c42a-be7d-1404bcd6b992@usit.uio.no>
- References: <hbf.20160519jnzl@bombur.uio.no> <573DE3E4.2060906@symas.com> <hbf.20160519m4jr@bombur.uio.no> <573DF513.9070903@symas.com> <hbf.20160519a2rj@bombur.uio.no> <hbf.20160519a40a@bombur.uio.no> <573E0364.3070505@symas.com> <66bbfed2-7939-c42a-be7d-1404bcd6b992@usit.uio.no>
There a lot of bugs around slap_callback.sc_writewait
https://github.com/ReOpen/ReOpenLDAP/commit/80c9667d823475710bb6c94a7735c290b9e256f4
Regards,
Leonid.
2016-06-06 9:18 GMT+03:00 Hallvard Breien Furuseth <h.b.furuseth@usit.uio.no>:
> I lost this thread (from May 19). Summarized in ITS#8435
> plus a new suggestion: Revert sc_writewait and get it
> done with a field somewhere else, maintained by callbacks.
> Dunno if that's feasible.
>
>